I've long followed Thunderf00t on youtube, he's a clear thinking, rational and articulate man, you should too.
Here he explains why the draw Mohamed day was a success.
Monday, 14 June 2010
Sunday, 13 June 2010
Saturday, 12 June 2010
One mans intercourse with a 'Christian Volunteer'
I just want to kiss this guy..
While preaching is not allowed in Australian public schools, it is apparently fine to replace school counselors with 'Christian Volunteers' such as Darryl.

Friday, 11 June 2010
Is Charles a closet commie?
Don't get me wrong he does some good work for the Princes Trust and for that I tip my hat to him. I know his heart's in the right place but at times he's just an idiot.
His constant fiddling with architecture, for which he has an opinion but no clear understanding of social architecture, and why would he with the upbringing he had?, really pisses me off. This rant is out of context here, however, this one isn't, he's taken to blaming environmental problems on the lack of belief in the 'soul'.
I think the point he wanted to make is that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts, for which I have some sympathy, we don't live in isolation, everything we do affects the world around us to some degree. But scientists are not stupid people, they know this. For some reason he blames the scientists. Should he be pointing the finger at the businesses that steer decisions?
It seems to me the change he actually wants is to the capitalist economy that benefits the people who take unreservedly, where the people who get the most the quickest can make things the cheapest and that squeeze the ethics out of their policy?
Charles, just like religions, has good intentions but completely misses the mark.
Bear in mind this is man who talks to plants. I just wish people wouldn't listen to him.
His constant fiddling with architecture, for which he has an opinion but no clear understanding of social architecture, and why would he with the upbringing he had?, really pisses me off. This rant is out of context here, however, this one isn't, he's taken to blaming environmental problems on the lack of belief in the 'soul'.
He said he found it “baffling” that so many scientists professed a faith in God yet this had little bearing on the “damaging” way science was used to exploit the natural world.Blow it out yer ass Charlie. What he is alluding to is that morals come from faith. Yet in that very statement is a contradiction of his own point. If these scientists 'believe in God' then why are they 'acting immorally'?
I think the point he wanted to make is that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts, for which I have some sympathy, we don't live in isolation, everything we do affects the world around us to some degree. But scientists are not stupid people, they know this. For some reason he blames the scientists. Should he be pointing the finger at the businesses that steer decisions?
It seems to me the change he actually wants is to the capitalist economy that benefits the people who take unreservedly, where the people who get the most the quickest can make things the cheapest and that squeeze the ethics out of their policy?
Charles, just like religions, has good intentions but completely misses the mark.
Bear in mind this is man who talks to plants. I just wish people wouldn't listen to him.
Thursday, 10 June 2010
I suppose...
...we should lay out our manifesto in the first blog post, but I think it should be a work that has time and care taken over it and not rushed. We'll post it when it's done.
Suffice to say we want to design out the bigotry, hatred and ignorance that religion manifests and we think one way to help do this is to be vocal about the fact that you're a rational, free thinking individual.
We don't believe we should feel bad about being Atheists or Agnostics or Skeptics, after all we don't feel bad about not believing in the Easter bunny, do we? But some of us have to deal with 'Catholic Guilt' and Islams demand for the death penalty for apostasy is designed to scare people out of questioning the dogma. By being vocal about it we can show the oppressed that it is OK to think.
Suffice to say we want to design out the bigotry, hatred and ignorance that religion manifests and we think one way to help do this is to be vocal about the fact that you're a rational, free thinking individual.
We don't believe we should feel bad about being Atheists or Agnostics or Skeptics, after all we don't feel bad about not believing in the Easter bunny, do we? But some of us have to deal with 'Catholic Guilt' and Islams demand for the death penalty for apostasy is designed to scare people out of questioning the dogma. By being vocal about it we can show the oppressed that it is OK to think.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

